WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

To: Daniel <danms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
From: David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:27:40 -0500
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:25:04 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8764s2edei.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1129142873.5982.12.camel@dbarrera_tp> <8764s2edei.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 12:36 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> Just a comment about these results:
> 
> >             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> >               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
> >      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
> 
> The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
> of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
> last night.  In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and
> most marked as expected.
Dan,

Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly more.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   77 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   60 |   27 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   59 |   28 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   79 |    9 |     3 |     5 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> 
-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>