|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation
On 10 Oct 2005, at 16:28, Ryan Harper wrote:
Either we should take set_max_vcpus, and have that implicitly do the
work of VCPUOP_create, or we should take VCPUOP_create (callable only
by domain0) and have that implicitly increase max_vcpus for the
subject
domain.
OK. I'll re-work VCPUOP_create to be callable only by dom0 and
auto-increment max_vcpus.
Do you even need a max_vcpus variable? Surely the appropriate check is
implicit in VCPUOP_initialise detecting whether or not the relevant
VCPU has been created?
I like small code and simple interfaces. :-)
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 2nd try: 0/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 2nd try: 1/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 2nd try: 2/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] 2nd try: 2/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] 2nd try: 2/2 VCPU creation and allocation, Ryan Harper
|
|
|
|
|