* Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-10-10 10:26]:
>
> On 10 Oct 2005, at 16:16, Ryan Harper wrote:
>
> >Also included is a new VCPUOP,
> >VCPUOP_create, which handles all of the vcpu creation tasks and leaves
> >initialization and unpausing to VCPUOP_initialize.
>
> I think two new Xen operations is one too many.
>
> Either we should take set_max_vcpus, and have that implicitly do the
> work of VCPUOP_create, or we should take VCPUOP_create (callable only
> by domain0) and have that implicitly increase max_vcpus for the subject
> domain.
OK. I'll re-work VCPUOP_create to be callable only by dom0 and
auto-increment max_vcpus.
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|