|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface
On Monday 03 October 2005 17:00, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> The cost must also be paid by domains that don't require shadow page
> tables (32-bit on 32-bit, in particular).
The next sentence in my mail said that a normal hypercall would effectively
have the same performance impact...
> The 64-bit dom0_op patch you posted misses 64-bit-ifying the page-frame
> arrays of GETMEMLIST and GETPAGEFRAMEINFO2. I had a go at 64-bit-ifying
> the dom0_op interface myself, and gave up at those two because they are
> particularly invasive to change.
Couldn't a field be added indicating the size of the resulting type? I have to
run right now, but I'll think about it more.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface - padding, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Hollis Blanchard
RE: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Nakajima, Jun
Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Kip Macy
RE: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Ian Pratt
[Xen-devel] Re: 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Andi Kleen
RE: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Nakajima, Jun
RE: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Ian Pratt
RE: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Nakajima, Jun
|
|
|
|
|