|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface
On Sep 30, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
There's the rub: we don't expect to ever want to provide 32-bit x86
ABI compatibility on 64-bit x86 Xen. We will not be supporting 32-bit
paravirtualised guests on 64-bit x86 Xen, and we've taken the approach
of requiring separate 32- and 64-bit toolsets (which isn't too painful
on x86 since full-fledged 64-bit filesystems are quite easy to come
by).
That's great, if all you care about is x86. That is how Linux started
of course, and look where we are now... I think portability and
well-designed interfaces are nice things to think about earlier rather
than later. :)
Really this sounds to me like this is only going to be a problem for
ppc. That given, knocking up a translation script to import the
interfaces into your 32-bit toolchain does seem worthy of
consideration. It wouldn't allow you to use the same tool binaries on
both 32- and 64-bit ppc Xen, but I don't know how much you actually
care about that...
A translation script seems exceedingly difficult. A separate set of
headers would be less so, but extremely fragile.
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Hollis Blanchard
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Hollis Blanchard
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, David
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Hollis Blanchard
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface,
Hollis Blanchard <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] 32/64-bit hypercall interface, Andrei Petrov
|
|
|
|
|