|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?
> OK - so for a bridging setup, on d0, as I understand it from that script,
> we're supposed to have 4(!) interfaces now:
>
> eth0
> veth0
> vif0.0
> xen-br0
>
> One thing I find odd is that it assigns the IP address to veth0, but
> vif0.0 is the one that gets added to the bridge with eth0 - is that the
> expected behavior?
>
> How does veth0/vif0.0 relate to the physical device? Is it just another
> entirely "virtual" device, or should I be able to take eth0 down, assign
> the IP to veth0, and have things work?
veth0/vif0.0 is basically a two-interface (back-to-back) loopback
device. Packets transmitted on one interface are received on the other
(with appropriate copying and checksum-offload twiddling).
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Nate Carlson
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Gerd Knorr
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Gerd Knorr
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Nivedita Singhvi
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] veth0 stuff in -unstable?,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|