| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen & Transmeta (from xen-users)
On 26 May 2005, at 21:59, Carl Holtje ;021;vcsg6; wrote:
Ok.. next hurdle- the ACPI checksum function
(xen/drivers/acpi/tables.c)
is returning zero -- it calculates the sum to be 1536 (0x600). After
the
AND with 0xFF, zero results..
That's a _good_ thing: returning zero means the checksum was valid. The
checksum is a single byte value, which is why the return value is ANDed
with 0xff.
This appears to really throw everything else (the remaining ACPI stuff)
off, as other ACPI properties aren't located/read/understood. This
confusion results in a page fault originating from
xen/drivers/acpi/tables.c#acpi_table_get_sdt ..
It's not been thrown off -- the fault is probably due to a table not
being properly dynamically mapped, or something like that. Look
carefully where the pointer you are dereferencing originated from.
Is this indicative of issues to come, or is this just part of
supporting a
new platform?
If the CPU has a local APIC and supports 4MB superpages then it
oughtn't to be that hard to get working...
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home