WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen bugzilla

To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen bugzilla
From: Paul Larson <plars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:16:42 -0500
Cc: James Bulpin <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:16:32 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4269210D.2000501@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1114184000.23365.177.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4269210D.2000501@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:06 -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> James Bulpin wrote:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > As requested we now have a bugzilla bug tracker for the Xen project. It
> > is available at http://bugzilla.xensource.com/ 
> > 
> > Registration is required to submit and modify bug reports. We hope to
> > support anonymous reports in the near future. 
> > 
> > Please let me know of any problems or suggestions, extra components,
> > categories, etc. desired.
> 
> Excellent job, guys, much thanks! I logged in and could create an
> account in under a 30 seconds, email exchange and all.
> 
> Just a few trivial questions:
> 
> 1. The Component field has the following:
First, many THANKS for doing this!!!!
I do agree that the components probably need some work, but I'm sure
exactly which components to have will become more clear going forward.

> 2. The Version field has 2.0, unstable, unspecified.
>     Do you want -testing as a separate category or in the 2.0
>     bucket? Are you going to add the individual releases
>     2.0.4, 2.0.5, etc? The finer granularity in the Version
>     field does make it easier to search - especially once
>     you have a long history :).
That makes a lot of sense to me.  Is it going to get confusing as
unstable feeds into testing, and testing into stable, which unstable
we're talking about when submitting a bug against unstable?  Just a
thought.

-- 
Thanks,
Paul Larson
plars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtestproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>