WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen and Vanderpool

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen and Vanderpool
From: Dave Feustel <dfeustel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:58:58 -0500
Cc: Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:45:24 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1D1NHo-0006vE-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1D1NHo-0006vE-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dfeustel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 06:24 am, Steven Hand wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday 16 February 2005 03:39 am, Steven Hand wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Has any testing of Xen using Vanderpool Technology been done?
> > > 
> > > Yes - works just fine. We can currently support an unmodified 
> > > Linux kernel with fully virtualized devices, etc. 
> > > 
> > > YMMV getting your hands on a VT-x box though - they're not 
> > > widely available just yet. 
> > 
> > This is encouraging! Is AMD implementing Vanderpool or something else?
> 
> AMD has announced a technology called Pacifica which is likely to 
> be similar to VT (i.e. it's targeted at the same space), but there
> are no public documents or release timescales as yet. I think they
> had alluded to Q405 at some point, and yesterday at LinuxWorld some
> reports claim Q205, but don't think there's an "official" release
> date. 

Yes. I saw the release but was unable to locate any technical docs.
My question about Intel/Vanderpool was prompted by printing out and
reading the preliminary Vanderpool specs.

Is the Vanderpool-based VM monitor code OS-specific or will the code
that you have run Linux with work for other operating systems?


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel