WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] atropos still broken?

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] atropos still broken?
From: Diwaker Gupta <diwakergupta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:25:23 -0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:44:59 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OuBnDxjZlJAkRrZ+5NbSRfsvD6TgMlGNUItntNcFmjo2VNnFcGmm0Ox1SWtOd8TSd+Q9Ap1jv2dqflF0URWRgvAndQXFGjG0Q1qFEXiIMo+no0oTx85TsEBQxOAiVys+7rZ5Vi5swPNoZrpEOfvn7xN1EOQaAdIyDC7VtFkglAQ=
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Diwaker Gupta <diwakergupta@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi everyone,

This is for Xen 2.0.3. I'm really interested in the functionality of
atropos (enforcing CPU partitioning in a non work-conserving fashion).
As I had reported earlier, atropos seemed broken in 2.0. It still
seems broken now:

$ xm list
Name              Id  Mem(MB)  CPU  State  Time(s)  Console
Domain-0           0      123    0  r----     49.1
vm1                1       47    0  -b---     29.7    9601

$ xm atropos 0 10000 100000 50000 1
$ xm atropos 0 70000 100000 50000 1

Now if I run the slurp program (posted earlier in this list) in vm1,
it eats up all the CPU. If I start the same program in dom0 as well,
both get ~50% of the CPU. With those parameters, ideally vm1 should be
getting 70% and no more, and dom0 should be getting 10% and no more.

So it seems atropos is still broken. Is a fix being worked upon? I'd
really like to help in any way I can. I'm familiar with the Xen
scheduling code; if any of the developers have any idea of where/what
the bug is, I'd like to take a crack at it.

Thanks,
-- 
Diwaker Gupta
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>