|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] atropos still broken?
Hi everyone,
This is for Xen 2.0.3. I'm really interested in the functionality of
atropos (enforcing CPU partitioning in a non work-conserving fashion).
As I had reported earlier, atropos seemed broken in 2.0. It still
seems broken now:
$ xm list
Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console
Domain-0 0 123 0 r---- 49.1
vm1 1 47 0 -b--- 29.7 9601
$ xm atropos 0 10000 100000 50000 1
$ xm atropos 0 70000 100000 50000 1
Now if I run the slurp program (posted earlier in this list) in vm1,
it eats up all the CPU. If I start the same program in dom0 as well,
both get ~50% of the CPU. With those parameters, ideally vm1 should be
getting 70% and no more, and dom0 should be getting 10% and no more.
So it seems atropos is still broken. Is a fix being worked upon? I'd
really like to help in any way I can. I'm familiar with the Xen
scheduling code; if any of the developers have any idea of where/what
the bug is, I'd like to take a crack at it.
Thanks,
--
Diwaker Gupta
http://resolute.ucsd.edu/diwaker
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] atropos still broken?,
Diwaker Gupta <=
|
|
|
|
|