|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
hi,
is x2d2 (the minimal xend replacement in C if I understand correctly)
still alive? I do not have bk at the moment, but grepping on x2d2 in
the Changelog file only has a comment back from November. I can make
it compile by removing -Werror from the Makefile, but is anyone using
it and working on it, or is it a dead end?
I don't think so. It shouldn't actually work anymore. It doesn't do
proper notifications on event channels. There's also a bug in the way
ports are allocated.
Is there still interest in x2d2 (or any C-based minimal xend)? I think
I could fix x2d2 pretty easily.
Yes, lots of interest from me, the python xend effectively keeps me from
running Xen 2.0, so I am still stuck with 1.3. The stock xend uses too
much memory, provides too much functionality, and depends on too many
third-party packages -- not the ideal specs for the minimal trusted
computing base I am trying to develop :-(
Jacob
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|