|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM 
| 
This could be harmless, or indicate memory corruption.
 -- Keir
> 
> On Jul 19, 2004, at 7:06 PM, Derek Glidden wrote:
> 
> >
> > I've booted Xen with "nosmp" and will do the same things I've been 
> > doing to it to make it break and see what happens.
> 
> hmm.  Running this same box, same Xen kernel, same linux kernel, but 
> with "nosmp", just creating a domain gives me about two dozen of these:
> 
> (XEN) (file=x86_32/emulate.c, line=228) Bailing: not a -ve offset into 
> 4GB segment.
> (XEN) (file=x86_32/emulate.c, line=235) !!!! DISALLOWING UNSAFE ACCESS 
> !!!!
> 
> But so far, no crashes.
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> "I think that's what they mean by   |
> "nickels a day can feed a child."   |       http://www.eff.org/
> I thought, "How can food be so      | http://www.anti-dmca.org/
> cheap over there?"  It's not, they  |--------------------------
> just eat the nickels." -- Peter Nguyen
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek GliddenRE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Chris Andrews
RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM,
Keir Fraser <=
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Chris Andrews
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |