|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM
It strikes me that many people have started seeing this bug all of a
sudden, so it has probably been introduced in the last week. Perhaps
it is worth someone backing off to an older repository version and
seeing whether they can reproduce the problems?
If we can 'binary chop' the changesets to isolate the bad one, it
would be a much easier bug to fix. ;-) Sounds like it would be a
fairly tedious process though...
The first person to complain I think was Jody Belka, who was using
the changeset with comment 'Fairly major fixes to the network frontend
driver...' (2004-07-13 18:24:48). Perhaps backing off to a day before
that would be a sensible place to start?
-- Keir
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:01:54AM +0100, Chris Andrews wrote:
> > Keir Fraser wrote:
> > >>Keir Fraser wrote:
> > >Do you mean a single 2.4 or 2.6 guest in addition to your 2.4 DOM0?
> >
> > Yes, that's right. With just the 2.4 domain0 on its own, everything
> > seems fine.
>
> OK using an image from Chris of dom1 i have been able to semi reliably cause
> all sorts of corruption including Oopses in dom0 and other domains.
>
> This is on 2 different machines one of which is thought to be atleast semi
> reliable.
>
> I first noticed it when doing a bk pull and having bitkeeper deciding
> that my tree was rather corrupt (in a dom0), but with other domains
> running.
>
> Running while (:) do tar cpf - . | gzip -3vc | cat >/dev/null; done
>
> http://www.yuri.org.uk/~murble/boom/ has some output, with the
> domain0 deciding to try and access beyond the end of device lots,
> but this could be caused by random memory corruption.
>
> Whilst trying to build somthing in dom0 seems a fairly reliable way
> of triggering it.
>
> Also my dom0 only had 48mb or so of ram but plenty of swap.
>
> Before the crash i noticed user programs that allocated lots of memory
> in dom0 randomly segfaulting, including apt-get update and apt-get
> build-deps.
>
> Again the oopsen i get were generally rather random, although i
> have noticed another possible XenoLinux bug. When you boot with
> panic=30 it takes ages for dom0 to reboot, far longer than 30 seconds.
>
> Even though after the panic it says rebooting in 30 seconds.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
- RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Chris Andrews
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Chris Andrews
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Wm
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Derek Glidden
- RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Christian Limpach
- RE: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Christian Limpach
- Re: [Xen-devel] segfault in VM, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|