WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-cim

Re: [Xen-cim] call in number?

To: "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-cim] call in number?
From: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:41:48 -0600
Cc: Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 May 2006 08:42:03 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <94C8C9E8B25F564F95185BDA64AB05F6039828CF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: xen-cim mailing list <xen-cim.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-cim@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <94C8C9E8B25F564F95185BDA64AB05F6039828CF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:

I am seeing the same issue we saw last week. The 798 5900 number is
busy.
Is everone else on a different bridge?

We used the 798-5900 number successfully this morning. Only Gareth and myself on the call. Sorry I didn't see your email before now :-).

Here is a brief summary of our discussion:

* Talked about progress made at f2f
* Yesterday I spent time introducing another hack to libxm shim. This hack supports "defined" state and will be used to move the providers forward until lower layers (xend, libvirt) provide this support. * OpenWBEM wants to support embedded instances at cimom level, isolating providers from parsing mof / cimxml. We want Pegasus to do the same so we'll be pushing these camps in that direction. * Support StopService in VirtualSystemManagementService only when no domUs running.

I think that was about it.  Did you have any issues to discuss?

Jim


_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>