WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-api

RE: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter

To: Lars Seeliger <meesterlars@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter
From: Tomoiaga Cristian <cristi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:39:47 +0200
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Jonathan Ludlam <Jonathan.Ludlam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:35:16 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTim1TO-axJ3dPtm1Pimmzh5D0EGxObWvW38SRAOd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-api@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1297786344874-3386189.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim22fKneCcOyZdoPBbaSm=-8LDSdQ5kZsiW=E-s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA33EE@baseex> <AANLkTin7u+m0nuXr4R_Dj2kKVqvT=quP6aKFYYoG4R0o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikPYkcsGDj1s8_Mb5Y1O0=vPqGDUDWCSOvannEJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimR19qvCAsK2AP6=xNGPDV-sgWa-P-C16qQTE41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA33F5@baseex> <AANLkTi=p2WCDS-ieknQB-sLSyTqNLvDGTodg3xyBt1H4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <34F09EA2-FE48-4DC7-950A-DDE2CA70A840@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTina6=05P10X=tKYzR=t1Vj_M_Tqx1pwMq8tztBG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA342B@baseex> <AANLkTik8mWakY317KGytkRwQ9b00TJw=zkPtSsA2Q=2u@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C16BD5DB91CF44292D2145E0D5237351D05DA342C@baseex> <AANLkTim1TO-axJ3dPtm1Pimmzh5D0EGxObWvW38SRAOd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcvOGVwhRKtaC/fASkSK4gFD4w+pbgAAApjQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter
QoS doesn’t do much good. I need to be able to set an upper limit of 
reads/writes ops.
QoS won't stop a VM from bringing down an entire storage.

Regards,
Tomoiaga


From: Lars Seeliger [mailto:meesterlars@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 10:33 PM
To: Tomoiaga Cristian
Cc: Jonathan Ludlam; xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter

XS 5.6 FP1 features QoS for virtual disks. Could this be what you're looking 
for? Surely this is also available in XCP.

http://docs.vmd.citrix.com/XenServer/5.6.0fp1/1.0/en_gb/reference.html#disk_qos
On 16 February 2011 19:40, Tomoiaga Cristian <cristi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, the XenCenter issue is partially solved now anyway.
A way bigger issue is being able to throttle iops/vdi. Seems nobody wants to 
answer if it’s possible (I am sure it is) and if there are any plans to 
implement something.
VMWare already has this and I am amazed why this is treated as not being 
important since almost everyone has problems when one VM creates too 
many/sepcific IOPS.

Regards,
Tomoiaga

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api