Re: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter

[Lars Seeliger <meesterlars@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the feedback, Tomoiaga. If what you say is true, I'm somewhat
 disappointed, as I really expected complete compatibility with 
XenCenter.

I've not been able to find the info you referred to - 
replaying the version in the xapi file - as I've never used freenode and
 don't really know where to start. Care to give me a link?

On 15 February 2011 17:55, Tomoiaga Cristian <cristi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The features like Snapshots, Memory a.o. do not appear because XenCenter treats XCP as being a very old version of XenServer (XenServer 1.0 I believe).
If you install the XenServer 5.6fp1 drivers inside one VM and change the version of XCP from 1.0 to 5.6 all features will appear and everything will work. Unfortunately this is not a very good solution but just for testing you can search on the history for #xen-api on freenode in order to find out how to replace 1.0 with 5.6 in the xapi binary file. Other then that, installing the XenServer drivers inside an XCP VM should be easy.
Come on guys it's a simple fix, report different versions if Xencenter connects to xapi, please!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Todd Deshane
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 6:37 PM
> To: meesterlars
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-API] Re: [Xen-users] XCP and XenCenter
>
> added xen-api to the CC
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:12 PM, meesterlars <meesterlars@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Good day. I've just today installed XCP 1.0 R2 in our test environment
> > and I'm thrilled to finally be able to see my servers in XenCenter.
> > Unfortunately, not all features appear to be functional. Things which
> > stand out, so far are:
> >
> > Licences - 29 days and counting down
> > Snapshots - no tab or means to create them VM protection policies -
> > greyed out Performance tabs don't display information, instead throw
> > an error Dynamic memory? Where? How?
> >
> > Those are the glaring issues. Are my findings congruent with what one
> > should expect from XCP and XenCenter? I was under the impression we'd
> > get feature parity with XenServer 5.6 FP1...
> >
> > Any comments?
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/XCP-and-XenCenter-
> tp3386189p3386189.h

> > tml Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
>

> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api