WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-api

Re: [Xen-API] New API Document and C Bindings

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:50:54AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

> > In that case I would suggest introducing a privileged flag for the VM 
> > classes. Maybe that ends up being a distinguishing factor between VMs like 
> > dom-0, driver domains and other guests.
> 
> Except that its not really representative of what's going on - it implies
> a discrete set of privilege levels can be assigned to domains. Domains

More generally it sounds like their needs to be two classes, one a sub-class of
the other. Certain things (vcpu pinnings, resource utilisation data) belong in
the superclass, other stuff in the other. Certainly the API would need to allow
people to identify what /kind/ of domain a particular representation is.

regards
john

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api