Re: [Xen-users] KVM vs XEN source

To:

Zary Matej <matej.zary@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject:

From:

Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx>

Date:

Sun, 21 Aug 2011 00:09:36 -0400

Cc:

Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pandu Poluan <pandu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date:

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:11:36 -0700

Dkim-signature:

v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rXd+BY+NMW4yUhW/8DNUagkH29T2ZsOStHzbEBKhe8U=; b=dHp/pf7e/VsAgPFGyjgv21LmyTerHVtmnHqTxmKHe4bqURrmiKqhEyB/OqJH9CQO/4 PuvxhRlDtLnbbAHGNdykUewACGRfOcuaTKQFMgTEt9vfpf9kPu2GYhizGT9Kb2tMHmRF BOZANdFm3PbPdi15b7x+GPpGmhF66Hcn5wNrg=

Envelope-to:

www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In-reply-to:

<5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA6A36779C75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

List-help:

<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>

List-id:

Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

List-post:

<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>

List-subscribe:

<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe:

<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>

References:

<CAMdBd2Crwk8N4BKZgAq+WOZCacwrZr4Y73GZ6VCv7kzaCQrqfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BD5A3768872D4AA4BBBC4A326B6FF21D@maindesk> <B1B9801C5CBC954680D0374CC4EEABA504A82F67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+WRXa_CicjuvK7rPUgx5PsVaxPOd7gsv-nx=v8QYhJYL7OaPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B1B9801C5CBC954680D0374CC4EEABA504A83262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAMrPLW+2k+B16SP1Sbbe4eT1gSLpn9uFmNiSb1Kg88Go6eZJ_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA2qdGXgW7_rdU65WmQdK5CPXhyHWVRCgRY_1W0wwyivQsLd-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA6A36779C75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sender:

xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Zary Matej <matej.zary@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Let's hope that both XEN and KVM toolstacks will find
> some common code usage (QEMU, SPICE, maybe
> OpenVSwitch) to not waste too much energy on doing the same thing just some 
> other way. :)

Xen unstable already has upstream QEMU support:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/QEMUUpstream

VirtIO support is also work in progress:
http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2011/07/19/wei-liu-status-update-of-the-virtio-on-xen-project/

XCP/XenServer already have Open vSwitch support. Open vSwitch is not
yet upstream yet, but once it is KVM and Xen (hypervisor) will easily
be able to have the support for it. People use Open vSwitch with Xen
(hypervisor) and KVM manually already.

Thanks,
Todd

-- 
Todd Deshane
http://www.linkedin.com/in/deshantm
http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html
http://runningxen.com/

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Anyone using xen with full disk encryption?, goodb0fh

Next by Date:

[Xen-users] openvswitch?, Alexandre Chapellon

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] KVM vs XEN source, Zary Matej

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] KVM vs XEN source, George Shuklin

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] KVM vs XEN source