WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] KVM vs XEN source

Just to add something anecdotal:

In my country, when people talk about virtualization (meaning: server
consolidation), they will talk about baremetal hypervisors, i.e.,
VMware, Hyper-V, and XenServer.

No one -- not even some IT SysAdmins I know who are rabid Linux
'evangelists' -- uses KVM.

As to why exactly, I don't know. But what I know is that in my country
it's relatively easy to find support for VMware, Hyper-V, and
XenServer. But no reputable System Integrator I know is familiar with
KVM.

When one's handling a mission-critical back-end infrastructure for a
multi-million dollar company, one wants full support (IOW, if anything
bad happens, I can whack the head of someone else).

Rgds,


On 2011-08-12, Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> When I think of the Xen/KVM arguments I usually consider the architectural
>> design issues and the features and performance of the core components
>> (kernel, hypervisor).
>
> The type-1 (stand alone) architecture that Xen has is one advantage
> that makes Xen stand out. Stub domains, driver domains, and dom0
> disaggregation will not be able to be achieved (at least not to the
> same degree and not on top of a monolithic kernel like Linux) by a
> type-2 (integrated) hypervisor like KVM.
>
> Xen has always had the best mix of performance, isolation (both in
> terms of security and performance), and scalability.
>
>> Management tools are important, but not an
>> interesting point of debate to me since one technology doesn't necessarily
>> have much of an advantage over the other in that regard, and layers like
>> libvirt tend to make the tools agnostic anyway.
>
> libvirt has many limitations in comparison to the Xen API. This is
> explained in detail by Ewan Mellor here:
> http://wiki.openstack.org/XenAPI. At a high level, the Xen API has a
> lot more functionality and is designed to for enterprise use.
>
> --
> Todd Deshane
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/deshantm
> http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html
> http://runningxen.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>


-- 
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users