WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] centos 5.6 upgrade to 4.1 - no DomUs listed

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] centos 5.6 upgrade to 4.1 - no DomUs listed
From: Andy Howell <AndyHowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 02:26:19 -0500
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 May 2011 00:28:30 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTik1S2njvxwdNXw3u3-0q-_jeC6ByQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4DD2C00A.2070307@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTimzPi+-AgCQLYG3oQDAK7y1ufuBag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DD2EF66.3060304@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTik1S2njvxwdNXw3u3-0q-_jeC6ByQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
Todd,
> 
> What is the output of running the command: xl create -c trillian
> 

I don't know. I had to switch to another box; one that is not running my mail 
server in a
VM :) Why did I think this was going to be easy...


The other box, also running CentOS 5.6, will not boot with xen 4.1. The stock 
xen worked fine.

Running with the DEBUG=Y on xen and kernel command line, I see its not able to 
recognise
the disk drives and build the raid device.

I get errors like:

ata2: Sata link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata 200: failed to identify (io error, err_mask=0x4)
ata2: failed to recover some devices retrying in 5 secs

Booting with non-xen kernel works fine. My brain is numb from hours of googling 
to no
avail. I'll try again tomorrow.

Regards,

        Andy

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users