 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen 4.1 + jeremy 2.6.32 pv_ops: does it work?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 4.1 + jeremy 2.6.32 pv_ops: does it work? |
| From: | Mark Dokter <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:02:10 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:04:51 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1303815737; i=@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bh=PUKfXZ3jxhraHDeLbmKKM3vBUEOtbC3i37/ra8nejwc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Nl6/AN6SQaC6CLePBlswmOuXxNo1c5EJYeSyyMRg+Bo5xAV9HsdOzyeeCkFfXW3DJ 6pBqL5g6nWPOfClajyABHChpwoRE2N2exK944nBdcsUN/eOdfgvZ5/GLR7fUg1mmZl 4eosAwgu3Cl4uX6Lw2Qh+3TN8MLMXnPfYVDJ3fwY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4DB17356.3040503@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision |
| References: | <4DB17356.3040503@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
On 04/22/2011 02:23 PM, Niccolò Belli wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to backport xen-4.1 packages for Debian Squeeze, does Xen-4.1 > work with Debian stable's kernel? I have set up a Debian Squeeze box last week, added the unstable repositories and used pinning (google apt pinning) to install just the xen 4.1 unstable packages. Unfortunately those packages seem to be broken - there's no /etc/init.d/xencommons and no qemu-dm :( Then I compiled xen 4.1 from source and everything seems to work now. > Also, is there any reason why 2.6.39-rc4 does not boot with xen-4.0? If > I recall correctly 2.6.38 did work flawlessly. > The debian package linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 seems to work well. One good thing to note: I use drbd, which is not present in the 2.6.32 kernel from xen-stable git repository. The Debian kernel is patched with drbd support. > Cheers, > Darkbasic > hth, -- Mark Dokter - System Administrator Institute for Computergraphics and Vision - http://www.icg.tugraz.at Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16/II, 8010 Graz, Austria Phone: +43/316/873-5036, Fax: +43/316/873-5050 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen vs XCP, Gémes Géza |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] vif-common.sh and iptables, Dmitry Nedospasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] xen 4.1 + jeremy 2.6.32 pv_ops: does it work?, Ward Vandewege |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] How to enable local storage caching - XCP 1.0, Morpheo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
