WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: R: [Xen-users] XCP and Openfiler as the storage

To: Dustin Marquess <dmarquess@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: R: [Xen-users] XCP and Openfiler as the storage
From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:08:20 +0200
Cc: cluster@xxxxxxxx, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Bragatto <eduardo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:09:28 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=G0FEGE5uwdCjYekYp2eleFdbahHAyo2npxubKbdpCAgIeeZSLAHB8ElTOthjzc3Fe997xzYREmubUaSJ83R5U8bLtl+A0S3lkStFVCg5DldCKXt8le9kOONlMpuX+GJG;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=0k=umr3PVs0mh62gewhOL-PEzHQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <09AEB48E-7B0D-4CD6-8BDB-0FE1AAEF07D6@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <002801cbf3ad$ee52b2c0$caf81840$@xinet.it> <44F0AA09-5ABE-4FE4-8E83-5414A24ECEAA@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9DDDC0B4-52F4-4AD9-8716-F48F57D86C80@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.5077128e83.BANLkTimN+8-OJAYPP8o7XkYfiFeY4NLS0Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTi=0k=umr3PVs0mh62gewhOL-PEzHQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dustin Marquess <dmarquess@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I believe since each VM's vdi is assigned a different 'chunk' of the
> LUN, no two machines will ever be writing to the same chunk at the
> same time.
>



True, but what about high availabilty?

If one Hypervisor fails and all it's domU's need to be restarted on
another Hypervisor would it cause problems?

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users