|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Sharing file/folder 
| 
 
 2011/2/14 Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> 
The first question would be "why"?On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:41 AM, lucianobarreto@xxxxxxxxx 
<lucianobarreto@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: 
> Sorry if duplicated... 
> Thanks guys, let me expose my problem. I'm prototyping a fault tolerance 
> server (byzantine fault tolerance). Vms need do comunicate each order for 
> make decisions about requests. My host will be out of network (cant access 
> anything) and my Vms can comunicate to the external world, but the decision 
> need to be local.
Most HA-systems are designed to work whether it's on a VM or on a
 physical machine. Normally you'd just use whatever mechanism you'd use
 on physical machine/
 
 
 It's an academical model that I'm trying to propose to my master thesis. On general models physical machines or vm exchange informations over the network (point of fail, man-in-the-middle, non reliable channels), than my propose is to use another way to exchange this informations.
 
> Yes, I could comunicate via network inside VM to exchangeVirtualbox shared folder has about similar performance as running> information but my propose is to have a reliable local share to do it. In
 > another work a friend used a Virtualbox folder share to do it, but now I
 > need increase performance and use Xen to do it.
 
 
 nfs/samba inside dom0 and mount it on domU.
 
 Yes, i need more performance not just in exchange information, but running the VMs (my choice to Xen).
 
 
 
You should be able to force-assign a block device to more than one> About clustered filesystems, any options to use it in a normal block device
 > like Sata HD or SCSI? I understand..."clustered"... but any option?
 > Thanks and I will get more information about clustered filesystems
 
 
 domUs with "w!" instead of just the normal "w" (e.g.
 phy:/dev/sda1,xvda,w!), skipping the normal
 you-can-only-assign-a-block-device-read-write-once check. Then you can
 run a cluster file system (OCFS2/GFS2/whatever) on top of it.
 
 
 I'll try it.... 
 
IMHO it's too complicated for your purpose though. Better stick tonfs/smb on dom0.
 
 --
 Fajar
 
Thanks
 
 --
 Luciano Barreto
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |