WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
From: riki <phobie@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:10:07 +0100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:10:57 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D4006E8.6040204@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <994429490908070711q4c64f92au9baa6577524e5c5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3463f63d0908070726y630d320u3e3f1f1cae9b34a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <sig.0007322cfd.AANLkTi=2S3bKf6jv9BbqYMbkWFbjJTrpYh8GK2EGXGns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FD940.1090000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=J-s+oc44wY-N_wQ+wQr=VhnG-EK48QYpx7y-Y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA18BFE6FF56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sig.3007784e19.AANLkTim+T5yAfovgX2JsH9BMp3r6agxCqRxVBoG7acXT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA18BFE6FF57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3FEB16.5040801@xxxxxxxx> <4D4006E8.6040204@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328)
No, it is not slow, it is basically nfs exported local directory which
is mirrored or striped over network on several servers, so e

Performance difference is block level access vs image file storage which
will cost you about 30%, but as soon as you are fine with nfs root for
DomU you are ok.

r.

> Is glusterfs not really slow? What performance are you getting with the
> Xen DomUs? Are take it your using gluster in the Dom0?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users