|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Which distro to use for Dom0
On 1/12/2011 11:06 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
On 1/12/2011 10:59 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:55 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
I am not worried about the xen version really. I have 4.0 on centos
currently from the third party repo. I mainly need whatever supports
the
best live/auto migration. Basically if I have a server fail I need
whatever was running on it to switch to the backup server
"automagically".
Food for thought: What would be the difference in the above support
between Ubuntu/Debian and Fedora 14?
Automatic VM migration in a failure would best be achieved with a 2-node
cluster. Fedora 14 would be best there, as I believe most of the
developers of Pacemaker and RHCS use Fedora/RHEL. At the least, it's
pretty RPM-centric, then gets ported to .deb's.
That in and of itself is not always the best argument though. It was
enough to make me switch from Debian/Ubuntu to RHEL (CentOS)/Fedora
though.
Thanks for the input. Currently we do not have any form of auto
failover so that is a must moving forward. So is pacemaker the best
way to provide auto failover with xen 4.0?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Also, where would XCP come into play with this? Is it something I should
consider?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|