WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Which distro to use for Dom0

To: Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Which distro to use for Dom0
From: Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:06:52 -0600
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:07:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D2DDDF4.1060302@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D2DC6AF.4090303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinrS=sggnkgTyEXTbitAOmwa6P6Y7EunJx3Z5xz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D2DCBCD.6090407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D2DD685.3090004@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D2DDD11.6060507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D2DDDF4.1060302@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
On 1/12/2011 10:59 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 01/12/2011 11:55 AM, Donny Brooks wrote:
I am not worried about the xen version really. I have 4.0 on centos
currently from the third party repo. I mainly need whatever supports the
best live/auto migration. Basically if I have a server fail I need
whatever was running on it to switch to the backup server "automagically".

Food for thought: What would be the difference in the above support
between Ubuntu/Debian and Fedora 14?
Automatic VM migration in a failure would best be achieved with a 2-node
cluster. Fedora 14 would be best there, as I believe most of the
developers of Pacemaker and RHCS use Fedora/RHEL. At the least, it's
pretty RPM-centric, then gets ported to .deb's.

That in and of itself is not always the best argument though. It was
enough to make me switch from Debian/Ubuntu to RHEL (CentOS)/Fedora though.

Thanks for the input. Currently we do not have any form of auto failover so that is a must moving forward. So is pacemaker the best way to provide auto failover with xen 4.0?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users