 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] XCP, technology question
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] XCP, technology question |
| From: | George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:21:11 +0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:03 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymYZB6XeC10gb1Cz3dl259ftpB9mp+6NqxqIrHFdF6o=; b=Zh5zYLHI+vbBirLPoB2i2Kaq/5N3tZ/iBY4Lj3o0yG2Fx0sS/+vTY7ZXj6NeY/F8Tg H/7wRbJQzPz0u7U5aJnR8BsVH8+H3YA4VzIK+siCkgdKBw6Do8TgyTk6dkWrWCfvxB7E bIvSppdoedUXqdP9zIof44IjhUO5qXu8tm/qk= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=aeY+HNpxk8L0fivUc8uJpuz1O87r5527+A4pFQzaU1N53RX5vs4KVe0YJy7ooLJQHM PLfRLgJGv2LokEwx+MEAZ0dkyVxkFLBp0hBnFwqQMfJI/JBl+X/+BKIGgCyYryO06now kQxPCBv7L8ZDEg76BHp9YagnkHyPM3K6OuP8M= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4CC07A26.6080506@xxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4CC07A26.6080506@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
One technology I hear is limiting IOPS for guest depends on access time to storage. If access time starts to raise (means storage near they throughput limit) VMWare limits number of IOPS for most disk-using VMs. I don't check this at works, but it sounds cool and I know XCP, Xen+xend or XenServer lacks of this feature. В Чтв, 21/10/2010 в 13:36 -0400, Vern Burke пишет: > Hey folks! > I was just reading an article today that claims 'VMware still has at > least a "five-year, pure-technology lead on both Xen Server and Hyper-V."' > > I'm not a VMware expert myself, so I thought I'd throw the question out. > Considering Xen Cloud Platform since it's leading XenServer, and > figuring the various management and operations packages rolling for XCP, > just exactly what, capability wise, is XCP missing in comparison to VMware? > > Vern > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] over-allocation of memory, George Shuklin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Resize NPIV Block Device, Nick Couchman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] XCP, technology question, admin |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] over-allocation of memory, Greg Woods |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
