On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:39:10AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Sorry, it's about only XenLinux config and setup .  Nothing about pvops.
> 
I
 meant for the performance comparison/benchmark you need to pay
attention to *pvops* configuration.
-- Pasi
> Boris.
> 
> --- On Thu, 10/21/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <
pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>   From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <
pasik@xxxxxx>
>   Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
>   To: "Boris Derzhavets" <
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>   Cc: 
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   Date: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 8:25 AM
>
 
>   On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 04:40:52AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>   > Actually, i would be glad to be wrong about performance numbers.
>   > Following bellow is how i set up 2.6.34.7 as bzImage under Xen 4.0.1
>   > on top of Ubuntu 10.10 ( Server or Desktop).
>   >
>   >
>   [1]
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/xenlinux-kernel-2-6-34-7-aka-suse-under-xen-4-0-1-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/>   >
> 
>   It's more about your *pvops* config, not xenlinux config.
> 
>   -- Pasi
> 
>   >
 Boris.
>   >
>   > --- On Thu, 10/21/10, Boris Derzhavets <[2]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   >
>   >   From: Boris Derzhavets <[3]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>   >   Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
>   >   To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <[4]
pasik@xxxxxx>
>   >   Cc: [5]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, [6]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >   Date: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 1:49 AM
>   >
>   >   > - How did you measure this performance difference?
>   >        Database server running on  PV DomU with intensive I/O.
>   >        Workload connected with loading and unloading tables
>   >        to/from ASCII files residing on the guest's  image.
>   >    > - Did you make sure kernel configuration is similar for both kernel types?
>   >    > Many pvops .configs have various debugging options enabled that kill the
 performance..
>   >
>   >   It's my personal impression. I am not an expert in PVOPS config tuning, but
>   >   try to avoid debugging options.
>   >
>   >   Boris.
>   >
>   >   --- On Wed, 10/20/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[7]
pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>   >
>   >     From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <[8]
pasik@xxxxxx>
>   >     Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
>   >     To: "Boris Derzhavets" <[9]
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>   >     Cc: [10]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, [11]
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >     Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 1:42 PM
>   >
>   >     On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:49:29AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>   >     >    Just wondering why [1]kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot
>   >     >    make itself
>   > 
    >    into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package
>   >     >    available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora's Libvirt has the best
>   >     >    compatibility with Xen 4.0.1.
>   >     >    It's not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7
>   >     >    aka Suse
>   >     >    is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen
>   >     >    4.0.1.
>   >     >
>   >
>   >     - How did you measure this
 performance difference?
>   >     - Did you make sure kernel configuration is similar for both kernel types?
>   >     Many pvops .configs have various debugging options enabled that kill the performance..
>   >
>   >     -- Pasi
>   >
>   >     >    I don't mention KVM performance. It's not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3
>   >     >    after the
>   >     >    most recent "zypper update"
>   >     >
>   >     >    Boris.
>   > 
    >
>   >     >    --- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young <[12]
m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   >     >
>   >     >      From: M A Young <[13]
m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   >     >      Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build
>   >     >      To: [14]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >     >      Date:
 Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:17 AM
>   >     >
>   >     >      There is less urgency to test now because 4.0.1-6.fc14 has now made it
>   >     >      into F14 in time for the release. You can of course continue to test if
>   >     >      you want to.
>   >     >
>   >     >          Michael Young
>   >     >      --
>   >     >      xen mailing list
>   >     >      [2][15]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >     >      [3][1][16]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >     >
>   >     > References
>   >     >
>   >     >    Visible links
>   >     >    1. [2][17]
http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm>   >     >    2. file:///mc/compose?to=[18]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >     >    3. [3][19]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >
>   >     > --
>   >     > xen mailing list
>   >     > [20]
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >     > [4][21]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >
>   >   -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>   >
>   >   _______________________________________________
>   >   Xen-users mailing list
>   >   [5][22]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >   [6][23]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>   >
>   > References
>   >
>   >    Visible links
>   >    1. [24]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >    2. [25]
http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm>   >    3. [26]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >    4. [27]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   >    5. file:///mc/compose?to=[28]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   >    6. [29]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users> 
>   _______________________________________________
>   Xen-users mailing list
>   [30]
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   [31]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users> 
> References
> 
>    Visible links
>    1. 
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/xenlinux-kernel-2-6-34-7-aka-suse-under-xen-4-0-1-on-top-of-ubuntu-10-10-desktop/>    2. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>    3. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>    4. file:///mc/compose?to=
pasik@xxxxxx>    5. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    6. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
   7. file:///mc/compose?to=
pasik@xxxxxx>    8. file:///mc/compose?to=
pasik@xxxxxx>    9. file:///mc/compose?to=
bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>   10. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   11. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   12. file:///mc/compose?to=
m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   13. file:///mc/compose?to=
m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   14. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   15. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   16. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   17. 
http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm>   18. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   19. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   20. file:///mc/compose?to=
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   21. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   22. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   23. 
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>   24. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   25. 
http://fedorapeople.org/%7Emyoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm>   26. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   27. 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen>   28. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   29. 
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users>   30. file:///mc/compose?to=
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>   31. 
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users