[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel

To:	xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:51:26 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1287413369; bh=OQ+q9C+aUbHS/0+j/4MSROF+qHAi7e7KuPunzf0hFWY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b4NplpWEz+CCG7z2xM0S39dMhOhZwey+ftBXD3Ej3xrTGsnqWuRLKuVKWf1IhiytoLuakOuGRx+cZp6PQKKt8KX9a4N3wQm0VIXWNAX3A1QIRzJgDsjh0fhQyIK5LlSZRTfTX5CInTaoZjpUQn3GRaXJ2yCndJKiAvWLceokBKo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eUGkmXuyR+Q3rLR0t81FJOgzPiyLzGZ8CsC9nHUPXRrsy6biAVhRqwTnZK7nT+fmwWXZ4QDrk4KnUQrHVj0QQTsUMuVx7e5vaUOuqrWIiZFo+wAFXhyYnbM8759uIw6jbypt2VtjT//Wt2beTYaRwdbsVipbXHJRyxpW2O/cG1o=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<alpine.GSO.2.00.1010181113380.22664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Just wondering why kernel-2.6.32.23-170.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm cannot make itself
into F14. It seems pretty stable. Why it cannot be just a package available via "yum install" . Anyway Fedora's Libvirt has the best compatibility with Xen 4.0.1.
It's not too late switch back to Xen with PVOPS kernel. XenLinux 2.6.34.7 aka Suse
is really dangerous . It outperforms pvops kernel about 15-20 % under Xen 4.0.1.
I don't mention KVM performance. It's not a competitor for OpenSuse 11.3 after the
most recent "zypper update"

Boris.

--- On Mon, 10/18/10, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build
To: xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:17 AM

There is less urgency to test now because 4.0.1-6.fc14 has now made it
into F14 in time for the release. You can of course continue to test if
you want to.

Michael Young
--
xen mailing list
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build and pvops kernel