|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Xen Security
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jonathan Tripathy
<jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Do people on this list generally trust
Xen with their private data, mixed > with public VMs? The folks over at
Slicehost, Amazon etc.. seem to...
"mixed" as in having an "intranet
only" VM and a "public facing" VM in the same dom0 box? Yes.
Anyway,
like Bart mentioned, "seclusion is created by software. In theory it is the
same thing as physical seclusion, until the software fails or is
compromised." IMHO the risk is no bigger than (say) having a L2 switch
separate public and private network with vlans. There are some risk involved,
and you have to decide whether you can accept it or
not.
-- Fajar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this sums it up pretty well! We could even go as far
as saying that the firewall which seperates our DMZ/LAN could have unknown
flaws. Anyway, I'm sure if something show-stopping comes up, I'm guessing this
list will be the first to hear about it!
Bart, good point on the liability issue.
Does Xen 4.0 have any security fixes compared to 3.4.2? Or is
4.0 more about features (which could potentially create more
holes)?
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|