xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Openvswitch
Hi Matej,
So in your opinion, my setup is ok, except that I should use a DomU
distro which supports PV for the sake of performance?
Otherwise everything else is ok (even with the PCI passthrough of
the 2 NICS and the 2 briges etc..)
Thanks
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on
behalf of Matej Zary Sent: Thu 20/05/2010 14:00 To:
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [Xen-users]
Openvswitch
Well, just one thing - I wouldn't use HVM DomU as
firewall/router for my virtual networks. On older hardware the HVM DomUs have
weak (don't want to say terrible/horrible/dreadful :D) network performance
unless pv-on-hvm drivers used (PCI passthru doesn't help a lot in this topology
- it would not solve the slowness of inter DomUs network
communication).
What about Vyatta for FW/router (http://www.vyatta.com/)?
Dedicated
management NIC for Dom0 is always good idea - Dom0 shouldn't be on the same
network with DomUs IMHO - Dom0 lan access should be treated like IPMI/ILO/KVM
access ports on physical servers
IMO.
Regards
Matej
-----Original
Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Tripathy Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:40 PM To:
Nick Couchman Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [Xen-users]
Openvswitch
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your very helpful
email.
What I want to set up, is a 3 interface system: WAN, LAN and
DMZ.
So far, the lauout I'm thinking is similar to this: http://www.shorewall.net/XenMyWay.html
In
a nutshell, I will probably create a firewall in a DomU, and delegate a PCI
physical NIC to it (which will be used for the firewall's WAN interfae). Then
create 2 "bridges" (one for "LAN" interface, and one for "DMZ" interface) and
assign a vif from each bridge to the firewall DomU. Neither bridges will have a
physical NIC attached to it. Of course, there will be other DomUs connected to
the respective bridge. The 2nd physical NIC of the server will be delegated to a
DomU machine in the "LAN" subnet. This will be an LTSP Terminal Server, and will
be connected to a physical switch for all my thin clients to connect
to.
I intend to use pfsense (Which is BSD based, which I think works with
HVM mode) in the DomU, instead of shorewall (as described in that
link).
For the actual bridges, I will probably follow the following link
so make it more "Layer 3 switch like": http://www.standingonthebrink.com/index.php/ipv6-ipv4-and-arp-on-xen-for-vps/
<http://www.standingonthebrink.com/index.php/ipv6-ipv4-and-arp-on-xen-for-vps/>
I
will probably need a 3rd NIC to access as a management interface. I really do
need some help secureing the Dom0.
Think this is safe? I really do need
it to be very secure, due to PCI (credit card details)
compliance
Thanks
Jonny
________________________________
From:
Nick Couchman [mailto:Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx] Sent:
Thu 20/05/2010 13:22 To: Jonathan Tripathy;
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Xen-users]
Openvswitch
> Hi Nick, > > Thanks for the
email. > > I currently use the free version of VMWare ESXi, and I
can make my > "own world" with it. You say I can do this with XCP, however
is it > just for testing purposes? Is it insecure for production
purposes? >
Sorry to be unclear about that - my pointing out the
usefulness for testing purposes, I was not saying that it's insecure or unstable
for production use. It just seems to me that about the only time you want
your virtual machines on an isolated network is when you're doing some sort of
Test/Dev environment - production machines are most useful when they're
connected with the rest of the world. I can see some scenarios where you'd
use an internal network, though, to connect some production machines, in
addition to their external network devices. Anyway, the point is that,
yes, the ability to create a bridge in XenServer/XCP/Xen is stable, secure, and
production-ready. Just create a bridge without an external network
device!
-Nick
--------
This e-mail may contain
confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not
responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please
note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR)
Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly
prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this
message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and
delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this
message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor
attributable to
SEAKR.
_______________________________________________ Xen-users
mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|