On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:13:16AM +0200, Pim van Riezen wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> Last reply went all kinds of places but where they should go. Attempt #2:
>
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:13 , Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:38:19AM +0200, Pim van Riezen wrote:
> >> On Apr 8, 2010, at 16:28 , Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>
> >> Which exact kernel versions are you using? From which kernel
> >> tree/branch?
> >>
> >> The last we tried was 2.6.32.9 from [1]kernel.org. Had the same results
> >> with [2]kernel.org 2.6.31.5.
> >>
> >
> > OK. Are your guests 32bit or 64bit?
>
> 64 bits.
>
Ok. Then it's not that.
> > I think 2.6.32.10 has the CONFIG_HIGHPTE fix.. so earlier versions will
> > crash
> > if CONFIG_HIGHPTE is enabled for 32bit kernels.
>
> That shouldn't be an issue then. Should I move the soft lockup issue to
> xen-devel?
>
> >> Am I going mad? This is a vanilla kernel.
> >
> > No, you're not mad.
> > pvops *dom0* 2.6.32 kernels require Xen 3.4.3 or Xen 4.0.0.
>
> Ah, that 'splains :-)
>
:)
> > Gitco has Xen 3.4.2 rpms.
>
> Must have missed those, will give it a try. Although I don't expect further
> updates to the hypervisor to solve this.
>
Can you please post the soft lockup messages again..
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home