|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Questions on qcow, qcow2 versus LVM
Thanks. I've got this working now. One last issue remains, it would
appear this technique, although it works, is screwing up quotas. I get
this error reported:
Cannot stat() mounted device /dev/xvda1: No such file or directory
I definitely have everything needed for quotas in the domU. I think this
is because the quota system expects /dev/xvda1 to exist and it doesn't
because I am mounting the whole disk. Have you come across this before?
Many thanks,
Matt
On Wed, December 30, 2009 10:39 am, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Why not use sfdisk? Here's an example
>
> # cat partlist.txt
> 1,,L,*
>
> # lvcreate -L 10G -n testpartlv rootvg
> Logical volume "testpartlv" created
>
> # sfdisk /dev/rootvg/testpartlv < partlist.txt
> Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ...
> BLKRRPART: Invalid argument
> OK
>
> Disk /dev/rootvg/testpartlv: 1305 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
>
> sfdisk: ERROR: sector 0 does not have an msdos signature
> /dev/rootvg/testpartlv: unrecognized partition table type
> Old situation:
> No partitions found
> New situation:
> Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from
0
>
> Device Boot Start End #cyls #blocks Id System
> /dev/rootvg/testpartlv1 * 1 1304 1304 10474380 83
Linux
> /dev/rootvg/testpartlv2 0 - 0 0 0
Empty
> /dev/rootvg/testpartlv3 0 - 0 0 0
Empty
> /dev/rootvg/testpartlv4 0 - 0 0 0
Empty
> Successfully wrote the new partition table
>
> Re-reading the partition table ...
> BLKRRPART: Invalid argument
>
> If you created or changed a DOS partition, /dev/foo7, say, then use
dd(1)
> to zero the first 512 bytes: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/foo7 bs=512
count=1
> (See fdisk(8).)
>
> # lvremove /dev/rootvg/testpartlv
> Do you really want to remove active logical volume testpartlv? [y/n]: y
> Logical volume "testpartlv" successfully removed
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Questions on qcow, qcow2 versus LVM,
Matthew Law <=
|
|
|
|
|