Re: [Xen-users] Oracle on a classic Physical server Win2k3 versusOracle on domU win2k3

[Rémi BERNIER <R.BERNIER@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Pasi,

I just finished the swingbench test
with a dedicated CPU but it's the same performance.
When i will have time, I will test on
Xen 3.4.1



On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:32:59AM +0100, Rémi BERNIER
wrote:
>    Yes my windows guest is fully CPU but i thought  to
have better
>    performance regarding the number of transactions per
seconds compared a
>    Physical server.
>    Thanks,
> 

Have you tried pinning the guest vcpus to separate physical cores? And
dedicating a separate core for dom0?

Also, did you try with Xen 3.4.1 ?

-- Pasi

>    Rémi
> 
>    On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:55:40AM +0100, Rémi BERNIER
wrote:
>    >    James, Pasi,
>    >
>    >    Yes it's just a swinbench on the performance
of transactions on a
>    Oracle
>    >    database.
>    >    But not a network test.
>    >
>    >    My CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130
@ 2.00GHz, when i test with
>    >    swingbench, my domU is full cpu (near
197%)
>    >    The result of iowait with command:
iostat 1  -> %iowait = 0.00
>    >
>    >    Thanks in advance.
>    >
> 
>    Ok so it's fully CPU bound.
> 
>    Then you should measure CPU usage in the Windows guest
and figure out
>    where all the CPU time goes..
> 
>    -- Pasi
> 
>    >    Rémi
>    >
>    >    While running the test, run "xm
top" in dom0.
>    >
>    >    How's the cpu usage? are your cpu cores
maxed out?
>    >    What's using cpu?
>    >
>    >    Also run "iostat 1" in dom0
(it's in sysstat package), and see if you
>    >    have a lot of iowait in dom0..
>    >
>    >    -- Pasi
>    >
>    >    >
>    >    > I just finished the swingbench
test with new drivers (0.10.0.130)
>    but
>    >    it's the
>    >    > same result about 8400 transactions
per seconds..
>    >    > So if you have an idea, i'm listening
to you.
>    >    >
>    >    > Thanks in advance and good week.
>    >    >
>    >
>    >    Is the swingbench test disk i/o bound?
Or network too?
>    >
>    >    James
>    >
>    >    _______________________________________________
>    >    Xen-users mailing list
>    >    Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    >    http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Xen-users mailing list
>    Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users