|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
 
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Grant McWilliams
<grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Grant McWilliams
>> <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > DomU to DomU -  1.93 Gbits/sec
>>
>> Ah ... so domU <-> domU is working FINE, right? That is similar with
>> the results I get :
>
> It isn't working fine. I said at the end of my message that the numbers
> aren't quite right because I didn't post both halves of the bidirectional
> test. The second half is 1/4 the speed of the first.
I posted the result for self-compiled 2.6.29-xen domU in my second
mail on this thread (I got around 1-2 Gbps). Here's one for domU with
RHEL's kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 (same dom0):
# iperf -c 192.168.122.49 -r
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.122.49, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  5] local 192.168.122.144 port 64178 connected with 192.168.122.49 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  2.57 GBytes  2.21 Gbits/sec
[  4] local 192.168.122.144 port 5001 connected with 192.168.122.49 port 45773
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]  0.0-10.0 sec  2.66 GBytes  2.29 Gbits/sec
-- 
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Igor S. Pelykh
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Brian Krusic
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance,
Fajar A. Nugraha <=
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 
  
  
  
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fasiha Ashraf
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Pasi Kärkkäinen
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - RE: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Dustin Henning
 
- Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |