|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
 
 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha  <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Grant McWilliams 
< grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> CentOS 5.4? If my time machine worked :-) . I'm already running CentOS 5.3 
> with Gitco's Xen 3.4.1. 
> 
> Here's another system: CentOS 5.3 Dom0, CentOS 5.3 DomUs on a Dual Core Duo 
> Xeon system (2.8ghz) 
> 
> DomU to DomU -  1.93 Gbits/sec 
> DomU to Dom0 -  2.76 Gbit/sec 
> Dom0 to DomU -  193 Mbits/sec
  Ah ... so domU <-> domU is working FINE, right? That is similar with 
the results I get :
   It isn't working fine. I said at the end of my message that the numbers aren't quite right because I didn't post both halves of the bidirectional test. The second half is 1/4 the speed of the first.  
 Can you post the whole bidirectional test for DomU to DomU like the one below? As soon as I get my Virtual Server back up I'll post full numbers. I didn't realize until the end of the test that I was only recording one direction. The reverse direction numbers are 1/4 the speed. Anyway I'll do more comprehensive testing. 
  
 
As for dom0 -> domU performance, it is indeed lower, and I'm not sure 
why. In my case it's still usable though (about 600-800 Mbps), since I 
don't run any service on dom0 that is used by domU. Here's my dom0 <-> 
domU result. 
 
# iperf -c 192.168.122.1 -r 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
Server listening on TCP port 5001 
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
Client connecting to 192.168.122.1, TCP port 5001 
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) 
------------------------------------------------------------ 
 [  5] local 192.168.122.49 port 52890 connected with 192.168.122.1 port 5001 
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth 
[  5]  0.0-10.0 sec  2.72 GBytes  2.34 Gbits/sec 
[  4] local 192.168.122.49 port 5001 connected with 192.168.122.1 port 16809 
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth 
[  4]  0.0-10.0 sec    747 MBytes    627 Mbits/sec 
  
 
192.168.122.1 -> dom0's virbr0, running RHEL5.4 64bit, 
kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5, Xen 3.4.1. 
192.168.122.49 -> domU, kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 
 
I'm not sure why your dom0 -> domU is about 3 times slower than mine. 
Perhaps newer kernel version matters. 
 
-- 
Fajar
    
 
  
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, peter_booth
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Igor S. Pelykh
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Brian Krusic
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance,
Grant McWilliams <=
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 
  
  
  
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fasiha Ashraf
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Pasi Kärkkäinen
 
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
 - RE: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Dustin Henning
 
- Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |