| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen and SAN.
> In my case, I want to use 3 physical servers and 1 SAN to manage 10-15
> virtual servers.
>
> What is the best solution : ISCSI (1Gb/s) or Fibre Channel (4Gb/s)?
That depends on your needs. I'm personally skittish about passing disk
blocks over ethernet and prefer FC, but it's expensive and if you
believe [some of] the pundits, everything is going to ethernet
eventually anyway. I think it's still safe to say though that at this
time, if you need really reliable disk at theoretically-higher
performance and you can afford it, go with FC.
> What kind of device are you using ?
4Gb/s FC to EMC DMX-3 and IBM DS-4700 through Brocade fabrics.
> For the moment, I'm interesting about HP technologies with
> bladesystem c3000 and msa2324.
FWIW, our experience with HP's blades has been less than thrilling,
wouldn't recommend them. We have a few (5) of IBM's BladeCenters though
and we've been extremely happy with them. I think they're more
expensive up-front (?) but well worth it.
John
--
John Madden
Sr UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home