WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Dom0 vs native performance: does it look right?

Thanks for your input Peter, Tom, Stefan.

Regarding TLS well, is there any way to easily verify it is the
culprit? Reading the Wiki + mailing list searches seem to imply that I
have already disabled this? (with /etc/ld.so.conf.d/xen.conf file
containing "hwcap 0 nosegneg" as reported
http://www.xen-support.com/?p=180)

Here is my output from ldconfig -v (ref
http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx/msg00041.html c.f.
XenFAQ)

# ldconfig -v -p 2>&1 | grep libc.so
        libc.so.6 (libc6,x86-64, OS ABI: Linux 2.6.9) => /lib64/libc.so.6
        libc.so.6 (libc6, hwcap: 0x0018000000000000, OS ABI: Linux
2.6.9) => /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6
        libc.so.6 (libc6, OS ABI: Linux 2.6.9) => /lib/libc.so.6

That looks OK to me?

Cheers


2009/4/13 Peter Booth <peter_booth@xxxxxxx>:
> If you look at the wikipedia page for xen it suggests that the performance
> cost of enabling vanilla tls is 50%.
>
> It's worth trying the tls disabled configuration and seeing if this changes
> things
>
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Ravikesh Chandra <rcha108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. However could you please elaborate further on
>> your statement?
>>
>> I have the file
>> "/etc/ld.so.conf.d/kernelcap-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen.conf" which
>> contains "hwcap 0 nosegneg".. is that what you mean? I am running a
>> 64-bit installation btw.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> 2009/4/13 Stefan de Konink <stefan@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> Ravikesh Chandra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Firstly I am running CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco) and I've just
>>>> been testing the performance with the Unixbench test. What I found is
>>>> that running the test on the Dom0 (under Xen kernel) resulted in only
>>>> 50% performance of native! I appreciate there is always going to be
>>>> overheads with virtualisation but I just wanted to check with the list
>>>> if these numbers were expected? If that doesn't seem normal any
>>>> suggestions on what I could look at?
>>>
>>> no tls cflag is a start.
>>>
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users