|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Dom0 vs native performance: does it look right?
Hi folks,
Firstly I am running CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco) and I've just
been testing the performance with the Unixbench test. What I found is
that running the test on the Dom0 (under Xen kernel) resulted in only
50% performance of native! I appreciate there is always going to be
overheads with virtualisation but I just wanted to check with the list
if these numbers were expected? If that doesn't seem normal any
suggestions on what I could look at?
Native:
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 34739474.5 922.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1368.3 164.7
Execl Throughput 188.3 28715.8 1525.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 508398.0 1902.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 158973.0 1476.1
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 3337799.0 2169.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 1703323.3 1102.6
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 5979578.6 534.8
Process Creation 569.3 80856.4 1420.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 6240.0 1392.9
System Call Overhead 114433.5 5937086.6 518.8
=========
FINAL SCORE 985.7
Dom0:
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 33159482.3 880.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1399.8 168.4
Execl Throughput 188.3 8307.4 441.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 269880.0 1010.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 72967.0 677.5
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 2160271.0 1404.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 615502.1 398.4
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 2306450.5 206.3
Process Creation 569.3 16938.2 297.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 2537.3 566.4
System Call Overhead 114433.5 1956760.1 171.0
=========
FINAL SCORE 448.8
Regards
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|