Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken

To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken
From:	Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:24:43 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:25:53 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=6CVUFnY2KW5IzRlXTcI1wAk4Zj2RX1sFhtT/aDUUkYU=; b=VeLK/lZtTFCSBPwEn3KqtEHMWzfK9hvuXORQ39MGBLkvv4B8cov34cqmudvm4NZjgR TXU+5Wg3jg4p/qWJnzIwtmTIzf5S+F8ujuOpImkivR4wZENGOC5oqw/0FGcMqs3birli 2629ZGq7ihMtfEQ0w8lB6jnqkMolOADOy8Dt8=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=TOHKkCl0Gkud1s6O9RlsyUwTxUm6YoO5NtTWFoTXsNKhYf7dCPpjYIONR+7RBTB2NX and+3/geftxxe+e5QMvF8PHYfphDhXKulES0rW8nbxgk8e2QMTahVHUS3VHa2wE9JR5Y S0RSnZAEWPb2r69oO4emT19oaGHlF7tw+G6ws=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<49BC2994.6040404@xxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<gpe0vg$j67$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gpei6e$gcn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49BAFC72.4040501@xxxxxxxx> <49BB0184.1020503@xxxxxxxx> <49BB6F4A.90000@xxxxxxxxx> <49BC2994.6040404@xxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090124)

Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb:
> Has it ever worked?  If so, what kernel version did it stop working at? 

I've just tried a good old non-pv_ops 2.6.18 kernel:

I ran the same binary file, that segfaults on 2.6.28.7.
It runs just fine on 2.6.18.

I haven't tested any other pc_ops kernel version. I'm not sure, that it
ever worked with these kernel. Which was the first kernel version, that
had domU support? 2.6.28.0 ?

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-users] ramdisk, mattias

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] ramdisk, Fajar A. Nugraha

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken, Boris Derzhavets

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken