|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
Am Freitag, den 28.11.2008, 11:45 -0500 schrieb Venefax:
> My system disk is a raid 5 array, 800 GB, so it has plenty of throughput.
> But you say that any technique even NFS or even SAMBA, versos creating a
> file and sharing it via AOE will be comparable?
i guess that nfs(linux)/cifs will reach maybe 40 MB/s
iscsi maybe 60-70 MB/s
and aoe should reach 85 Mb/s
> Which technique would you pick?
aoe
> I have a back-to-back 1 GB Ethernet cable
> between the two servers.
> Federico
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Javier Guerra
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan Bauer
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance,
Thomas Halinka <=
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan Bauer
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan de Konink
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Ross Walker
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
|
|
|
|
|