|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
Stefan de Konink schrieb:
> My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links
> 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance.
Don't compare apples/oranges. iSCSI is a transport protocol and has
nothing todo with application layer stuff like NFS.
just my 5 cent
--
stefan
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Joseph L. Casale
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance,
Stefan Bauer <=
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Stefan de Konink
- Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Ross Walker
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Venefax
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance, Thomas Halinka
|
|
|
|
|