|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Debian domU interface naming strangeness
And in addition to this ;-)
localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth
netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver.
netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path.
This is not an error I think. It's an information.
If a fix mac adress isn't a working solution for you,
you might try to place this on your DomU kernel command line:
'xennet.rx_copy'
This is "copying recieve path".
Perhaps genereally using a newer version of xen hypervisor is also a
great idea ;-)
Cheers,
Alex
Stephan Seitz schrieb:
Additionally, add a fixed mac adress to your vif line in your domU
config, like
vif = [ 'mac=nn:nn:nn:nn:nn:nn,brigde=xxxxx' ]
otherwise domU's udev will start counting again on every boot (say,
mac address change)
Alexander Hoßdorf schrieb:
Hi,
Have you got persistent mac adress configured for domU?
You have a file called /etc/udev/rules.d/z25-persistent-net.rules in
debian DomU.
empty it and reboot DomU.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Alex
Ray Barnes schrieb:
Hi all. I've got a Debian domU I created from scratch a few weeks
ago. Every time I rolled it out previously in testing, it worked
fine. But now it seems to make the ethernet device eth1 rather than
eth0 in the domU:
localhost:~# ifconfig -a
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3E:3D:A0:30
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth
netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver.
netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path.
localhost:~#
Note that as eth1, it routes traffic just fine. I can ifconfig it up
and set an IP address, then get good routed connectivity. I'm seeing
this eth1 naming issue on dom0s running CentOS 5.0 with the stock Xen
3.0.3 (yes that means literally 5.0, not a higher minor number), as
well as Cent 5.1 with Xen 3.2.0 compiled from source. But obviously
it presents a problem since I can't count on consistent naming.
Thoughts?
-Ray
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
__________ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
Signaturdatenbank-Version 3316 (20080731) __________
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
__________ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version 3316
(20080731) __________
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|