Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux

To:	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux
From:	"Grant McWilliams" <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:54:38 -0700
Cc:	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:55:19 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=DWa9liNOPogxBDTsr3U+ThyOHSI+ZrOwQV7+GjIiDV0=; b=hxaQwZ8s8B+YYt0PGH/ylbmlzTApkGQMrxoqfk9hsmphlqv88kwHkirkvDkEtvs00v 3PHovoSe6j8Y4skB7n5FyCxqcdWGp5ytmBFZi5OCMLMEhrSONuuAE1TcUYyeaJHJQblP tQdJPEz252arYPiytv8LbGjwM7XGNw9XYFSRo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=wKKn/OGIPoVhy+0S0+5T6xdGQ/NrRaJjGIJn6jwdzdoxZt7yhywhGEuLcjYSKfsJoZ wNN4j33AYWGLPT9J7zYpvcMK5+mS0GBfvx3IsWP7YNvP4S0tpjTCnnC13tZpJDXain8C qEfqtlkCcKymWbfUTHO8lsPEP2U5I6DEVPkKg=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080731090845.GH23888@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<48910C99.10606@xxxxxxxx> <20080731090845.GH23888@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Fedora 9's kernel-xen package has been based on the mainline kernel from
> the outset, but it is still packaged as a separate kernel. kernel-xen
> has been dropped from rawhide (what will become Fedora 10), and all Xen
> support - both 32 and 64 bit - has been rolled into the main kernel
> package.

Does this mean in the future all Fedora kernels will be Xen kernels? Is this wise? If I try to run VirtualBox on a Xen kernel the machine will reboot. If the Vbox module is loaded at runtime it will reboot forever. Yes, I know it's a Vbox issue but what about KVM. Can we run KVM on a Xen kernel?

Or am I reading this completely wrong?

Grant

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux