WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] RE: The death of XEN by Novell

Federico,

I have been out of the office for a while and just read this thread.  Did you 
get your issue resolved?  Was Lynn (or someone else from Novell) able to help 
you?  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Jason

>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at  6:06 PM, in message
<000001c8eb8e$bb469e70$31d3db50$@com>, "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Dear Lynn
> Why don't you take ownership of the case since obviously the engineer is not
> up to date?
> If you log into the box you may notice that I am pinning the dom0 to VCPU 0,
> and excluding the domu's  from using it. I also restricted dom0 to 4 GB out
> of 127.
> Is this setup what causes the issue?
> When that happened, a while earlier, I was doing a backup of a large
> database over the network. The curious thing is the largest database backup
> finished fine. It blew-up when I was backing up the other smaller database,
> or maybe the first large database blew some buffer and the second got
> affected. I cannot know, but that was the only operation that was unusual
> that night. The Windows boxes have a note with a minidump, which probably
> can be used to trace what driver is the culprit. I can do the same operation
> tonight of somebody wants to set up some traces.
> 
> I can be reached at 954 444 7408, 24x7.
> Yours
> Federico
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lynn Bendixsen [mailto:lbendixs@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 7:21 PM
> To: 'Mark Williamson'; 'Antoine Benkemoun'; Venefax; Ky Srinivasan
> Cc: stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: The death of XEN by Novell
> 
>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, in message
> <039901c8e9c2$e5dd4530$b197cf90$@com>, "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote: 
>> Subject: The death of XEN by Novell (case number 10406546031)
>> 
>> According to Novell, Xen has a flaw that in fact means it is useless.
> I have 
>> a single supported system with SLES SP2, where I have 3 Windows VM's
> and 5 
>> Linux VM's. In each of the Windows VM's I have 8 Virtual CPU's,
> because I 
>> have a vital SQL Server installed where my company runs all its
> business. The 
>> data comes precisely from the Linux virtual machines, and having the
> database 
>> "right there" has proven extremely efficient. But all my three
> Windows VM's 
>> crashed simultaneously yesterday and I lost two hours of business. I
> am using 
>> of course the right Novell drivers, etc., every piece of the puzzle
> in place. 
>> Novell already checked that. The engineers showed me a technical note
> that 
>> says that having more than one Virtual CPU in a Windows VM leads to
> crashes.
> 
> The technical note you refer to here is outdated.  It is for SLES 10
> SP1 and earlier. Here is a link to our current Support Document for Xen
> in SLES 10 SP2.
> http://www.novell.com/rc/docrepository/public/37/basedocument.2008-06-10.975
> 2681390/SUSE_Linux_Enterprise_10_SP2_Virtualization_Technology_Support_Techn
> ical_White_Paper_en.pdf
> To summarize breifly: we support multiple vcpus for Windows guests in
> our SLES10 SP2 and later hosts.  Any issues encountered with multiple
> VCPUs in windows should be reported and its certainly a high priority
> for us to help you get it working.  All of the testing we do has 2 or 4
> vcpus by default in each Windows VM.
> 
>> But then we cannot have any windows VM at all, hello!!! This means
> that the 
>> $35.000 box that I bought is the wrong box, because now I need to
> remove my 
>> windows VM and create a separate windows installation, and order more
> 
>> hardware, spend more money. It means that XEN is useless, because if
> it only 
>> can virtualize Linux, actually Virtuozzo (Open VZ) has a lot less
> overhead, 
>> far less. The beauty of Xen is that it is supposed to virtualize
> Windows and 
>> Linux together. Now, that dream is gone. In case somebody wants to
> look at my 
>> Novell case number, it is 10406546031
> 
> 
> 
> Lynn Bendixsen
> Software Engineer
> lbendixs@xxxxxxxxxx
> 801-861-2887
> 
> Novell, Inc. 
> SUSE* Linux Enterprise 10 SP2
> Your Linux is more than ready 
> http://www.novell.com/linux
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users