|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] CPU load balancing 
| | Thank you Gabriel for the document. I found it very interesting and instructive. Now, I understand that my idea is useless and childish. I want to improve my knowledge of schedulers. I found in Xen Wiki an article about Credit Scheduler (a priori, it is the default scheduler in XEN now).
 I use the backported XEN 3.2 on a Debian Etch.
 Is it possible to test the work-conserving (WC) and non work-conserving (NWC) modes?
 Is it possible to test the other schedulers (BVT and SEDF)?
 
 Best regards,
 
 --
 Andreï V. FOMITCHEV
 
 --- En date de : Jeu 24.7.08, Gabriel Southern <gsouther@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
 
 De: Gabriel Southern <gsouther@xxxxxxx>Objet: Re: [Xen-users] CPU load balancing
 À:
 fomitchev@xxxxxxxx
 Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Date: Jeudi 24 Juillet 2008, 0h46
 
 
 I'm not sure if the idea you are proposing is really useful.  Thecredit scheduler will already allocate unused CPU time to other VMs,
 if you don't have a cap configured, it does not necessarily follow
 weight percentage allocation exactly.
 
 You might find this research paper helpful:
 http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/~dgupta/papers/per07-3sched-xen.pdf
 
 On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Andreï V. Fomitchev
 <fomitchev@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > Hi all.
 >
 > I continue to study the XEN possibilities and currently I search a
 'CPU load
 > balancing tool' which answers the scenario below:
 > Configuration: using sched-credit command, the 4 DomU are the same weight
 > and each uses only 15% of CPU.
 > The balancing tool monitors the DomU CPU loads and if two (or
 more)
 > consecutive measures of CPU load equal to 100% of CPU and if the other
 > domains are in Idle mode, the tool increases the Domain weight and
 allocates
 > more of CPU. When the Domain terminated and  "returns" to Idle,
 the tool
 > returns the Domain configuration in nominal mode.
 >
 > 1) Because I did not find a response in XEN documentation, my first
 > questions are "philosophical":
 >  - this kind of tools is it interesting? Can it provide some improvements
 of
 > performances on-the-fly?
 >
 > 2) I found some tools which manage the load balancing of entire clusters.
 I
 > think that it is possible to adapt them or their algorithm to CPU
 balancing
 > but I think also that I am not the first to meet this issue... Did you
 read
 > something about a tool which can answer my needs?
 >
 > Thank you for your answers.
 >
 > Best
 regards,
 >
 > --
 > Andreï V. FOMITCHEV
 >
 > ________________________________
 > Envoyé avec Yahoo! Mail.
 > Une boite mail plus intelligente.
 > _______________________________________________
 > Xen-users mailing list
 > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 >
 
 _______________________________________________
 Xen-users mailing list
 Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 
 Envoyé avec Yahoo! Mail.
 Une boite mail plus intelligente.
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |