|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen: invalid source and/or image destination
I have the same problem with centos 5.1...that is not having the xenbr0 option when using virt-manager. I originally installed a windows OS and it did give me the option, obviously with a fully virtualized system. However, after updating the host system a couple days ago, the xenbr0 option is gone. The only option I have is using a virtual network that assigns virbr0 and that doesn't work. Any one else seeing this and have a solution? Thank you.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:22 PM, new2xen < colinking@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not using 127.0.0.1 makes complete sense....
I have got it working; would you believe I had used up all the free DHCP IP
address trying to get it work??!!!!!
I did hit a major issue that may need some investigation: I have recently
received and installed a few new patches (via the auto updater) which once
applied has the affect to removing the "Shared Physical Device - xenbr0"
from the VM Manager options... very odd.
I have rebuild and have XEN working with a single CentOS 5.1 guest - I now
have the 35 updates to apply.... I'll post again if I get the same issue....
In the event all being well - Thank you all very much for your time.
Colin.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Xen%3A-invalid-source-and-or-image-destination-tp15764149p15841040.html
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen: invalid source and/or image destination, (continued)
|
|
|
|
|