[Xen-users] Xen 3.2.0 Intel VT real-mode improvements

To:	<xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-users] Xen 3.2.0 Intel VT real-mode improvements
From:	"Joris Dobbelsteen" <Joris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:53:27 -0000
Delivery-date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:54:14 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Achas23hEND6T35pSfKJxZ+glrmSOA==
Thread-topic:	Xen 3.2.0 Intel VT real-mode improvements

Dear,

Looking at the Xen 3.2.0 announcement, I spotted the following line:

>Preliminary support for a wider range of
>bootloaders in fully virtualized (HVM)guests,
>using full emulation of x86 real mode 

Since we talk about x86 real mode emulation this should be Intel VT
support. Does this mean FreeBSD can be get to work on Intel processors
or is this support upcoming (or not)?

- Joris


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Previous by Date:	[Xen-users] kernel-xen ?, Riccardo Veraldi
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.2 release build broken?, Ralf Schenk
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] kernel-xen ?, Riccardo Veraldi
Next by Thread:	[Xen-users] Re: M2N32, suse 10.3 and network problem, Chris Epicier
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] Xen 3.2.0 Intel VT real-mode improvements