|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?
Ok then. I thought that Etch uses Xen 3.0.3-1 which is 3.0.3, but I was
probably wrong.
Thanks
[STD]Ein wrote:
Debian Etch includes Xen 3.1 packages (2.6.18-5-xen-686 packages), and you
can get 3.1 for Sarge in backports. I'm using the Debian packages on an x86
system and haven't had any issues, or found any shortcomings.
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kanour-xen
Sent: November 11, 2007 1:47 AM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?
Hi.
Just simple question. I have Debian distribution. In the past I always
compiled Xen from source. However, Xen packages are already included in
Debian Stable (amd64).
What is worth? Compiling or using binary installation of newest Xen 3.1
or using the debian packages of Xen 3.0.3?
Thanks for your opinion.
Jiri
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|