 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation? |
| From: | kanour-xen <xen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:46:53 +1100 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:47:57 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071009) |
Hi.Just simple question. I have Debian distribution. In the past I always compiled Xen from source. However, Xen packages are already included in Debian Stable (amd64). What is worth? Compiling or using binary installation of newest Xen 3.1 or using the debian packages of Xen 3.0.3? Thanks for your opinion. Jiri _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen / centos 5 / drbd, Erwan MAS |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?, [STD]Ein |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Questions: blocked / migration fails / device 768, Stefan de Konink |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?, [STD]Ein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
